Friday, January 26, 2018

Fourth USA Gymnastics board member resigns after abuse scandal

Circuit Court Judge Rosemarie Aquilina addresses Larry Nassar, a former team USA Gymnastics doctor who pleaded guilty in November 2017 to sexual assault charges, during his sentencing hearing in Lansing
Circuit Court Judge Rosemarie Aquilina, seen here talking to Nassar, has addressed each victim and repeatedly said she will make certain Nassar gets a lengthy prison sentence. Prosecutors are seeking a life sentence. "He will die there," Aquilina told one victim. "The next judge he faces will be God." REUTERS/Brendan McDermid
(Reuters) - A fourth USA Gymnastics board member has resigned amid increasing public pressure after disgraced long-time team doctor Larry Nassar was sentenced to up to 175 years in prison for abusing young female gymnasts.
Kevin Martinez, an ESPN executive, said on Thursday that he severed ties with the gymnastics federation, after the U.S. Olympic Committee's chief executive threatened in an open letter on Wednesday to decertify USA Gymnastics unless the 18 members on the board of directors were replaced.
His departure comes after three other members, who held the board's leadership positions, stepped down on Monday. The scandal has already cost the USAG sponsors and heavily damaged its reputation.
"I joined the board just nine months ago, well after Nassar's departure from USAG, in the hopes of helping to move the organization in a positive direction," Martinez said in an emailed statement. "That hope for this board is no longer possible so I submitted my resignation."
Nassar, 54, was sentenced to 40 to 175 years in prison on Wednesday for sexually assaulting young girls under the guise of medical treatment, following a weeklong hearing that saw more than 150 accusers recount their stories in a Michigan courtroom.
He is already serving a 60-year federal sentence for child pornography convictions and faces a final sentencing next week in Michigan for three additional counts of abuse.
USAG's spokeswoman, Leslie King, did not respond to requests for comment on Thursday. In a statement on Wednesday, the federation said it supported the USOC letter but did not specifically address the call for board members' resignations.
The webpage listing USAG's board members appeared to have been taken down around midday on Thursday without explanation. Most of the remaining 17 board members contacted by Reuters either declined to comment or did not return requests for comment.
The USOC itself has not escaped criticism from some of the sport's biggest names.
"I have represented the USA in two Olympics and have done so successfully," gold medalist Aly Raisman, who accused Nassar of abusing her, said at his hearing. "And both USA Gymnastics and the U.S. Olympic Committee have been very quick to capitalize and celebrate my success, but did they reach out when I came forward? No."
Lou Anna Simon, the president of Michigan State University, where Nassar also worked, stepped down late on Wednesday night amid calls from critics and Michigan lawmakers for her termination.
"As tragedies are politicized, blame is inevitable. As president, it is only natural that I am the focus of this anger," Simon said in her resignation letter.
On Thursday, U.S. senators Richard Blumenthal, a Democrat, and Jerry Moran, a Republican, wrote a letter to USOC, USAG, Michigan State and the National Collegiate Athletic Association, demanding information on whether the institutions failed to investigate reports of Nassar's abuse.
More than 140 victims have filed lawsuits against USAG and Michigan State.
(Additional reporting by Joseph Ax in New York and Steve Friess in Lansing, Michigan; writing by Jon Herskovitz; editing by Gareth Jones and Cynthia Osterman)
Originally published on https://www.yahoo.com/news/usa-gymnastics-facing-resignation-pressure-over-abuse-scandal-104630788--spt.html

Trump plan to offer citizenship to 1.8m undocumented immigrants

Trump plan to offer citizenship to 1.8m undocumented immigrants

  • Share this with Email

Media captionUndocumented immigrants: "Life in the US is like a rollercoaster"
The White House has outlined an immigration plan for nearly two million people to become US citizens in exchange for funding for a controversial border wall with Mexico.
The framework was suggested by a senior Trump aide, ahead of legislative negotiations with Democrats.
The proposed bill, to be unveiled on Monday, requests $25bn (£17.6bn) in funds for a wall on the Mexican border.
The Democrats, who oppose funding for the wall, have criticised the plan.

What is the plan?

The details emerged in a conference call on Thursday between White House policy chief Stephen Miller and Republican congressional aides, according to US media.
Mr Miller reportedly described the White House plan as a "dramatic concession".
The blueprint sets out a 10-12-year path to citizenship for 1.8 million people.
Media captionCan US border agents lawfully search you?
This includes some 700,000 so-called Dreamers, immigrants who illegally entered the US as children and were protected from deportation under an Obama-era programme, Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (Daca).
The other 1.1 million would be immigrants who did not apply for Daca but are eligible for the scheme.
The White House framework also seeks to end two other initiatives often criticised by President Donald Trump.
It proposes to curtail so-called chain migration, permitting US residents only to get visas for their spouse and children, not for extended family members.
The White House also wants to scrap the diversity visa lottery, under which 50,000 people from around the world every year win Green Cards at random.
Media captionAm I American yet?

What's the reaction?

Republican US Senator Tom Cotton, one of the most conservative voices on immigration policy, welcomed Mr Trump's plan.
"The president's framework is generous and humane, while also being responsible," the Arkansas senator said in a statement.
Democrats were less impressed. "Dreamers should not be held hostage to President Trump's crusade to tear families apart and waste billions of American tax dollars on an ineffective wall," Senate Democratic whip Dick Durbin said in a statement.
New Jersey Senator Bob Menendez was among those tweeting their frustration.
This is what they’re calling a compromise? This proposal is a compromise between the far right and the alt-right.
United We Dream, a young immigrants' organisation, called the White House plan "a white supremacist ransom note".

Why is Daca important?

Mr Trump cancelled the programme in September and gave Congress a March deadline to come up with a new plan.
The president has so far rejected bipartisan proposals that have been presented to him.
Congress' failure to secure a deal on immigration triggered a brief shutdown of the federal government over the weekend.
Media captionThe missing - consequences of Trump's immigration crackdown
On Wednesday, Mr Trump said he was optimistic that a deal on immigration would be reached that included keeping the so-called Dreamers in the country.
He added that it was an "incentive" for so-called Dreamers to work hard and "do a great job".
The Republican president has made it clear that in exchange for making a concession to help accomplish a Democratic priority, he wants the party's backing for his signature campaign promise to deliver a border wall.
However, Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer this week withdrew an offer of funding for Mr Trump's proposed border barrier.

Clock is ticking

Anthony Zurcher, BBC News, Washington
There's a quote from Mark Twain that if you don't like the weather in New England, just wait five minutes. The same could be said of Donald Trump's position on immigration.
One day he'll accept - and take the heat for - any bipartisan deal Congress might strike. Later, he insists any agreement must include funding for his border wall and sweeping changes to legal immigration.
During the shutdown, he painted Democratic efforts to get a Daca vote as support for "unchecked illegal immigration". On Wednesday, he expressed an openness to giving Daca recipients a path to citizenship - something many of his supporters deride as amnesty for lawbreakers.
This could be part of some grand "art of the deal" presidential strategy, which will only be revealed in hindsight. Or perhaps congressional parties should focus on people like chief of staff John Kelly, who stayed in Washington to negotiate while the president hob-nobs with the global elite in Davos.
Either way, the clock is ticking toward another budget showdown. If the immigration impasse is to be surmounted, a solution needs to emerge quickly.

Originally published on ...http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-42825431

Casey Affleck pulls out of presenting best actress Oscar


Casey Affleck pictured with his 2017 Oscar for best actorImage copyrightAFP/GETTY IMAGESImage captionCasey Affleck pictured with his 2017 Oscar for best actor
Oscar-winning actor Casey Affleck has pulled out of this year's Academy Awards, his publicist has confirmed.
By tradition, Affleck - who won best actor for Manchester By The Sea in 2017 - would have been expected to present the best actress award this year.
The actor, brother of Hollywood star Ben Affleck, was sued by two female crew members for alleged sexual harassment in 2010.
An Oscars spokeswoman confirmed that Affleck would not attend, saying: "We appreciate the decision to keep the focus on the show and on the great work of this year."

What are the claims against Affleck?

Affleck's accusers, producer Amanda White and director of photography Magdalena Gorka, say they were harassed during the making of the mockumentary film I'm Still Here, which Affleck directed.
Ms White claimed that Affleck had refused to pay her salary because she would not spend the night in a hotel room with him, and said she endured, "a nearly daily barrage of sexual comments, innuendo and unwelcome advances by crew members, within the presence and with the active encouragement of Affleck".
Casey Affleck at the premiere for I'm Still Here on September 6, 2010 in Venice, Italy.Image copyrightANDREAS RENTZ/GETTY IMAGESImage captionCasey Affleck at the premiere for I'm Still Here in September 2010
Ms Gorka alleged that Affleck, who was married at the time, had crawled into bed with her as she slept.
The actor's lawyers argued that the allegations were part of a scheme to extort money from Affleck.

Why is this back in the news?

The claims against Affleck have drawn renewed attention in the months since sexual abuse allegations were levelled against US movie mogul Harvey Weinstein.
The Weinstein allegations sparked the rise of the #MeToo hashtag, which inspired a global movement of women and men to share their stories of sexual abuse and harassment.
More than 300 actresses, writers and directors responded by launching Time's Up - a project to help fight sexual harassment in the film industry and other workplaces.
The initiative was announced via a full-page ad printed in the New York Times.
Meryl Streep and Emma Watson are among eight actresses to bring gender and racial justice activists as their guests to the Golden Globes, including MeToo founder Tarana Burke.Image copyrightAFP/GETTY IMAGESImage captionActresses including Meryl Streep and Natalie Portman brought gender and racial justice activists as their guests to the Golden Globes
At the 75th Golden Globe Awards earlier this month, a galaxy of A-list actresses took to the red carpet in black to honour victims of sexual harassment. Many actors signalled their support by wearing a Time's Up pin on their lapels.
Within a fortnight, though, more than one Golden Globes winner had been publicly accused of sexual misconduct.
US comedian and actor Aziz Ansari, who won the gong for best TV actor in a comedy or musical, was accused of sexual assault by a woman he had been on a date with. He responded that he had believed the encounter to be completely consensual.
Days earlier, James Franco, who took home the best actor in a comedy Globe, was accused of sexual misconduct or inappropriate behaviour by five women, including students from his acting school.
Director and star James Franco arrives for the gala presentation of "The Disaster Artist" at the AFI Film Festival in Los Angeles, California, U.S., November 12, 2017. REUTERS/Mike BlakeImage copyrightREUTERSImage captionSeveral women have accused James Franco of inappropriate sexual behaviour
He told a US TV show: "I have my own side of this story, but I believe in these people that have been underrepresented getting their stories out enough that I will hold back things that I could say just because I believe in it that much."
Franco was due to appear on the front cover of Vanity Fair's Hollywood issue, alongside the likes of Jessica Chastain, Oprah Winfrey and Tom Hanks but was digitally removed before it was published.
He had been photographed by Annie Leibovitz and interviewed, according to The Hollywood Reporter, before they made their decision.
A spokesperson told THR: "We made a decision not to include James Franco on the Hollywood cover once we learned of the misconduct allegations against him."
No reshoot was needed because those chosen for the cover are photographed separately in small groups.
He also chose not to attend the 2018 Critics' Choice Awards in the second week of January, while the controversy was at its peak.
The 2018 Oscars will take place on 4 March in Los Angeles.
Presentational grey line
Originally published on http://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-42827210

Trump denies trying to fire Mueller